“Mapmakers and Answer Givers”
According to Edwin H. Friedman in his book “A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix,” three interlocking characteristics of an imaginatively gridlocked system are: “an unending treadmill of trying harder, looking for answers rather than reframing questions; and either/or thinking that creates false dichotomies.”(Kindle, 684)
Regarding the “treadmill of trying harder” he uses an example of how maps were created that determined California as an island until the eve of the Civil War. He explains that these maps, were “so embedded in the imagination of cartographers” that it became a reality which lasted for 150 years. When we determine something is reality it is very difficult to wash it from the human psyche and often takes generations to accomplish. One concept I have been thinking about lately is that of countries and how we define them as “developed,” “developing” and “third world.” By labeling countries as “less than” it tends to give an imagined license to “help” them. Unfortunately, sometimes the help is not always desired, needed or helpful. The labels that we put on people determine our and sometimes their reality. If our intentions are to sincerely help and not raid them of their resources, then perhaps some labels might be helpful, otherwise perhaps not.
This causes me to question…what “realities” have we bought into that shape our imagination? How might this restrict possibilities? This generation cannot imagine a life without technology. What happens when the technology fails?
Friedman’s idea of “looking for answers rather than reframing questions” brought to mind a TED talk I recently saw where Brene’ Brown, a research professor in social work stated, “…we make everything that is uncertain, certain. Religion has gone from a belief in faith and mystery, to certainty. ‘I’m right, you’re wrong, shut up.’ That’s it. Just certain. The more afraid we are, the more vulnerable we are, the more afraid we are.” Instead of what answers are we missing, I think Friedman would say, what questions are we missing. What beautiful revelations might be awaiting our questions? How far out of our own thinking must we go to cause a personal Renaissance? How far are we willing to go? How might we accomplish this? How might we dive deeper into the questions and the mysteries.
Friedman’s third lock in gridlock, “either/or thinking that creates false dichotomies,” brings into question dualistic mindsets. Might it be helpful if we moved beyond apparent opposites into the yin yang of complementary forces. Within the yin yang symbol there are “seeds” of the other in each. This is what creates the balance. We tend to focus on “fixing” instead of embracing the strength in order to balance out the weakness. We are so focused on the need for “two” – either this or that, that we then create false dichotomies and forget there might be fresh ideas within the spectrum.
Does an ocean wave have only a beginning and an end? No, there is power and momentum that is gained throughout the force of the wave. How much are we missing by focusing on the “either/or” of a situation? How might we move beyond the apparent opposites of life, this illusion?
Have you experienced these types of gridlock in your own thinking? How might you unlock and move beyond?
How might we create new maps and look beyond giving answers to rethinking the questions?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.