Freedom [Kebebasan]
Introduction
The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense [1]by Gad Saad refers to the idea that certain harmful and irrational beliefs, which he calls “idea pathogens,”[2] can infect the human mind much like biological parasites infect the body. These “idea pathogens” distort rational thinking and common sense, often leading to destructive outcomes in society. Saad argues that these ideas are often rooted in postmodernism, political correctness, and other ideologies that reject objective truths.[3]
Gad Saad is a Lebanese-Canadian evolutionary psychologist and professor at Concordia University’s John Molson School of Business in Montreal, Canada. He was born in Beirut, Lebanon, his family Lebanese-Jews fled to Canada during the Lebanese Civil War.[4]
Summary of my most deeply held convictions before the readings and why I held/hold those beliefs:
My most deeply held convictions before the readings are the power of freedom. Freedom allows me to make choices about my life, empowering me to pursue my passions, goals, and dreams. Freedom gives me ability to embrace my faith and publicly claim my identity as a Christian. Freedom allows me to express myself, voice my opinions, access opportunities, enjoy fairness and experience social equity. For me freedom is a privilege though many do not agree with me. It is a force that shapes destinies and propels humanity forward. Today, Christianity is recognized as one of the major religions in Malaysia, even within an Islamic environment. God has blessed thousands of Christians in Malaysia the freedom to celebrate Christmas, Good Friday and Easter.
Saad wrote about freedom earlier in his book.[5] “The pursuit of freedom is also at the root of my professional career.” “Having occupational freedom is good for me.” *More freedom equals better health.” The freedom to navigate radically different intellectual landscapes.”[6]
Based on my experience, I concur with Saad that without the necessary freedom, there is no liberation to move forward as an individual or as a society. The opposite would be oppression. Freedom from oppression or fear creates a sense of security, peace of mind, enabling people to focus on what truly matters to them. The Bible emphasizes freedom through faith in God. For example, Galatians 5:1 says, “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.”[7]
How have my beliefs been affirmed by the readings and were challenged and why?
Through the lens of The Parasitic Mind, my understanding of freedom and its profound significance was both reinforced and challenged, inviting deeper reflection on how intellectual liberty shapes society and individual thought. The book reflected on the importance of freedom by highlighting how essential it is to protect intellectual and individual liberties. Gad Saad emphasizes the idea that freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and freedom to question established norms are cornerstones of a rational and thriving society. By presenting how “idea pathogens” suppress these freedoms—through political correctness, cancel culture, and suppression of debate—the book resonated with me as I hold freedom as a fundamental value.
My beliefs are challenged by the book’s critique of ideological conformity and suppression of debate, prompting reflection on how these dynamics might exist in everyday life or within my own viewpoints. Saad’s bold assertions encouraged me to examine the tension between preserving freedom and navigating modern cultural norms, creating space for deeper insight into how these forces interact. For instance, he highlights cases where individuals have faced professional or social consequences for expressing opinions that challenge dominant ideologies. This suppression of dissenting views can create an environment where people are afraid to speak openly, undermining intellectual freedom and rational discourse.[8]
One example could be a university professor who avoids discussing controversial topics in class due to fear of backlash or being labeled insensitive. This reluctance to engage in open dialogue limits the exchange of ideas and stifles critical thinking, which are essential for academic and societal progress.[9]
Conclusion
The Parasitic Mind serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of intellectual and individual freedoms in fostering a rational, thriving society. The book affirms the belief that freedom—whether in thought, speech, or personal choice—is fundamental to progress, peace, and purpose. At the same time, it challenges readers to confront the subtle yet pervasive forces that undermine these freedoms, such as ideological conformity and fear of dissent.
This exploration deepens the understanding of how freedom shapes destinies, highlighting its necessity in combating oppressive “idea pathogens”[10] and enabling open dialogue. Saad’s insights resonate strongly with those who value liberty, while his critiques encourage further reflection on the tension between freedom and societal norms. Ultimately, the book inspires action to defend and cherish freedom, a privilege that empowers individuals and strengthens communities.
[1] Gad Saad, The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas are Killing Common Sense, (New York, NY: Regnerny, 2021).
[2] Saad, XII
[3] Saad, XII
[4] Saad, 2.
[5] Saad, 9.
[6] Saad, 10-12.
[7] Galatians 5:1, Bible. (NIV).
[8] Saad, 29.
[9] Saad, 93-96.
[10] Saad, 40.
About the Author
Shela Sullivan
Born and raised on the vibrant Penang Island in Malaysia, I cherish the Malaysian greeting, “Mari Makan!!” which reflects the warmth of shared meals. Since 1996, I have called Oregon my home enjoying the raindrops and the serenity of its beaches. The ocean connects me to nature and energizes me. I am a Wife - Mentor - Traveling Pastor - Sourcing Manager Construction. Favorite Bible Verse: "Delight yourself in the Lord, and He will give you the desires of your heart." ~ Psalm 37:4~ I reside with my husband, David and our fur-baby Rolo. We share passions for travelling, culture, diverse cuisines, home improvements, classic cars and laughter.7 responses to “Freedom [Kebebasan]”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Thanks Shela. I particularly appreciated how you describe freedom not only as a social ideal but as essential for psychological and professional well-being. In a world where even university professors are hesitant to tackle controversial ideas, your voice is both brave and necessary. In environments where freedom of thought is legally protected but culturally suppressed, such as through social or professional consequences, what practical steps can individuals take to resist ideological conformity without alienating themselves from the communities they care about?
Thank you for your question, Glyn.
I believe it is all about finding balance—staying true to myself while nurturing my community. Meaning accepting of people, their beliefs and culture but not conforming to ungodly acts. I personally approach challenging situations from a place of not-knowing, focus on asking questions and sharing ideas in a respectful way. This comes from a non-threatening space and people are willing to have a cordial discussion then a debate.
Thank you Shela! In what ways have you seen freedom of speech and ideas practiced in our doctoral program? Where can we improve as a class and community?
Thank you for your question, Ryan.
In my observations, I see freedom of speech in our doctoral program thrives through collaborative discussions, sharing diverse perspectives, and research-based discourse in a respectful way. GFU has created a safe space for intellectual exploration. To enhance this environment, we could introduce structured debate formats or feedback systems to promote more productive exchanges. I think it would be motivating an energizing.
Shela,
Your writing about freedom reminds of Deneen’s book on Liberalism. Freedom comes by giving up our selfish interests and doing what is best for society as a whole. I think of the freedoms we enjoy found in the Amendments to the Constitution. They exist, but there are still limits to them, as there should be, when they are taken too an extreme and begin to harm others.
As we examine freedom, let me ask about freedom of speech. Currently, organizations that are tax-exempted are prohibited from being partisan. Do you believe that churches should be able to express partisanship from the pulpit without losing their tax-exempt status?
Wow! You got me Jeff. I am not an expert in this subject, but I will try to make sense. Churches expressing partisanship raises concerns about alienating members and losing focus on spiritual leadership. I think maintaining tax-exempt status while exploring into partisan matters may also blur lines between religion and politics, potentially compromising both. Balancing expression of moral convictions without explicitly endorsing political parties could protect the church’s mission and community harmony.
Hi Shela, Even though I have heard it before, your statement that freedom is a privilege within the context of your post gave me pause. Having known nothing else, I know I have taken this for granted. Thank you. If you could ask Dr. Saad one question, what might it be?