Using Wikipedia

The logo of Wikipedia.
Image via Wikipedia

There is an informative video on YouTube that will show you some ways that can help you with your projects and papers. Here is a quick run down on the differences between scholarly articles and Wikipedia and the best uses for both.

Scholarly articles

  • Written by acknowledged experts and scholars in the field
  • Authorship is known and credentials are provided
  • Bibliography is always included
  • Database searching for articles can be cumbersome
  • Reviewed by a panel of peers
  • Methodology of research is explained
  • Based on original research or new applications of the research of others
  • Uses technical or discipline specific language
  • Published in a specialized journal
  • Does not change
  • Acknowledged authoritative source

Best uses: academic research, defending your thesis, supporting your opinion, bibliography references


  • Best free electronic encyclopedia
  • No one is paid to provide or monitor content
  • Almost anyone can author or edit
  • Articles can change at any time
  • Citations can be unreliable
  • “Vandalism” can be a problem
  • Quick to update
  • Problems of bias—people, businesses and political parties editing content about themselves or others
  • Easy to navigate
  • Mixed reviews from scholars on the quality of the content
  • Controversial resource

Best uses: discovery, choosing a research topic, finding links to similar or related topics, quick reference

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in Wikipedia. Bookmark the permalink.