{"id":618,"date":"2013-10-18T02:13:35","date_gmt":"2013-10-18T02:13:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beta.dminlgp.com\/?p=618"},"modified":"2014-08-13T22:00:45","modified_gmt":"2014-08-13T22:00:45","slug":"theology-and-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/theology-and-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Theology and You"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ford, in his book <em>Theology: A Very Short Introduction,<\/em> calls us to look at theology in a holistic context with regards to our entire lives and the world around us. The author asks, <em>\u201cwhat is distinctive about our own period as a setting for doing theology?\u201d<a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftn1\"><strong>[1]<\/strong><\/a> <\/em>Ford answers to this question is, <em>\u201cthe pace, extent, and multifaceted nature of the transformations that are occurring.\u201d<\/em><a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ford goes on to use the concept of \u201cmodernity\u201d to describe theologies impact in today\u2019s world, and then he outlines the historical timeline for events starting from the Renaissance time period into modern-day life.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that basic theology hasn\u2019t changed throughout human history, however Ford presents the idea that it changes over time.\u00a0 \u00a0If it weren\u2019t for the fall of man, we wouldn\u2019t need theology.\u00a0 The relationship with Christ would negate the need for theology. The questions we are asking about theology and our world around us are the same questions that many have been asking since the time of Adam and Eve. The situation, time period, and experience may be different, but theology is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p>A significant thing that I gained from this book is Ford\u2019s use of the term dogma. The word <em>dogma <\/em>comes from a Greek and Latin word meaning \u201cthat which is held as an opinion\u201d and may also denote \u201ca doctrine or body of doctrines of theology and religion formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church.<a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftn3\"><sup><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> I have come to understand that everyone has a \u201cdogma\u201d. Whether you believe in God or another higher power, or in no higher power at all, you have a belief about something. This is the basis for which your theology or theology of the church is built upon.<\/p>\n<p>I appreciate how Ford touches on doctrine disciplines such as, systematic theology, dogmatic theology, doctrinal theology, or constructive theology<a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftn4\">[4]<\/a><br \/>\nwhen it comes to the basic Christian doctrine of salvation.\u00a0 While the author does not go into great detail about each one of these disciplines, he does introduce us to these terms and concepts for the purpose of getting us to ask questions about our theology and different ways to look at it.<\/p>\n<div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Ford, David (2000-02-24). Theology: A Very Short Introduction (p. 7). Oxford University Press. Kindle Edition.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> Ford, David (2000-02-24). Theology: A Very Short Introduction (p. 8). Oxford University Press. Kindle Edition.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftnref3\"><sup><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> Enns, P. P. (1997). <em>The Moody handbook of theology<\/em> (468\u2013471). Chicago, Ill.: Moody Press.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"#_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> Ford, David (2000-02-24). Theology: A Very Short Introduction (p. 105). Oxford University Press. Kindle Edition.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ford, in his book Theology: A Very Short Introduction, calls us to look at theology in a holistic context with regards to our entire lives and the world around us. The author asks, \u201cwhat is distinctive about our own period as a setting for doing theology?\u201d[1] Ford answers to this question is, \u201cthe pace, extent, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2,197],"class_list":["post-618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-dminlgp","tag-ford","cohort-lgp4"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=618"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1953,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618\/revisions\/1953"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}