{"id":40011,"date":"2025-01-16T17:26:17","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T01:26:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/?p=40011"},"modified":"2025-01-16T17:26:17","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T01:26:17","slug":"how-to-read-a-book-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/how-to-read-a-book-3\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Read a Book"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reading Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren\u2019s book, How to Read a Book<\/i> brought to mind a quote I read years ago by Petrarch, \u201cBooks give delight to the very marrow of one\u2019s bones. They speak to us, consult with us, and join us in a living and intense intimacy.\u201d\u00a0 Being a lifelong bibliophile, Adler and Van Doren reminded me how easy it is to get sloppy in habitual practices and delights, which are important to nurturing our souls and minds.<\/span><\/p>\n

The book was first published in 1940 and revised and updated by Simon and Schuster in 2014. How to Read a Book<\/i> is a meaningful rudder, helping readers navigate books for increasing competency and satisfaction, whether for personal pleasure or academic clarity.\u00a0 Adler and Van Doren make a strong case that reading more books is not the point. It is about learning to read better.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

From a practical standpoint, after having read thousands of books over the 65 years of my life, the practice of pre-reading struck me the most. I have never been challenged to consider it a valuable exercise. Whether due to impetuosity or a lack of self-discipline, I never really inculcated it into my reading habits.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Taking the time to look at the publishing data, table of contents, education, and qualifications of the writer is a valuable exercise. It is clarifying to discover the book’s overall theme and the perspective of the author who is writing. Adler and Van Doren make it quite clear that taking the time to pre-read will help us to determine which parts of the book are most important in our research and will help steer us to the parts most relevant to our interests. So far, I have found this very insightful and helpful, as simple as it seems.<\/span><\/p>\n

Actively reading and engaging books, as in a conversation, is also a great reminder. It is so easy to read the words in a book as sterile from their context, which usually leads to misunderstandings and assumptions that are not meant to exist. Reading actively requires discipline, and in many ways, stamina. This is a lost art. When people do read today, they often read a lot of drivel, rarely inviting the other senses into the process. Adler and Van Doren challenge us to go deeper. They encourage the reader not to satisfy themselves with a cursory examination of books, but to allow them to inform us and to increase our understanding of life.<\/span><\/p>\n

Adler and Van Doren\u2019s classification, or levels of types of reading was also very helpful. They posited four levels of reading. They are considered levels because\u00a0you can\u2019t grasp the higher levels without mastery of the preceding ones. These levels of reading are additive. The first level is Elementary reading. It is the level where most people settle. The rudimentary reading skill allows us to put meaning to words, but not necessarily deeper conceptual thoughts. This level allows us to move from illiteracy to fundamental literacy. It is not necessarily a level of reading well but a level of grasping the meanings of words. Reading more does not especially move you to a higher level. The Greeks had a name for people who read too widely and not well; they called them sophomores.<\/span><\/p>\n

The second reading level is Inspectional reading, skillfully browsing a book with brevity. This reading level prepares our brains to engage with what we are about to read and helps us decide if we want to invest time and energy into reading the entire book.<\/span><\/p>\n

The third level, also known as Analytical reading, is presented as a means to better understand what you are reading. Analytical reading is comprehensive, exhaustive, or good reading\u2014 it is the finest reading we can do.<\/span><\/p>\n

The last and fourth level of reading is Subtopical. It is the most difficult and complex kind of reading we can do. It is complex because it is not a linear process that most Western readers are accustomed to. It involves reading not just one book on a subject but may require a host of works on a particular matter. The level of complexity is immense because it involves serious thinking at multiple levels, and it shapes the reader’s understanding through intense analysis of multiple works. At this level, genuine understanding is generally achieved.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Adler and Van Doren\u2019s initial works in the 40\u2019s and 70\u2019s were a monumental achievement and were emphatically received by the academic, educational, and publishing community. Their work remains a significant piece of discourse, even into the 21st century.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reading Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren\u2019s book, How to Read a Book brought to mind a quote I read years ago by Petrarch, \u201cBooks give delight to the very marrow of one\u2019s bones. They speak to us, consult with us, and join us in a living and intense intimacy.\u201d\u00a0 Being a lifelong bibliophile, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":215,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1033,881],"class_list":["post-40011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-adler-and-van-doren","tag-how-to-read-a-book","cohort-dlgp04"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/215"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40011"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40012,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40011\/revisions\/40012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}