{"id":34421,"date":"2023-12-02T12:26:16","date_gmt":"2023-12-02T20:26:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/?p=34421"},"modified":"2023-12-09T15:48:29","modified_gmt":"2023-12-09T23:48:29","slug":"the-intersection-of-leadership-derailment-and-domination-in-the-church","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/the-intersection-of-leadership-derailment-and-domination-in-the-church\/","title":{"rendered":"The Intersection of Leadership Derailment and Domination in the Church"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. JR Woodward set out to write a book that \u201cwould offer theological immunity to the disease of domineering leadership in the church.\u201d <a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> In <em>The Scandal of Leadership<\/em>, Woodward dives into the heart of failures and scandals among male church leaders who become corrupted by the power they wield.\u00a0 In this academic and theological work, Woodward diagnoses the problem of domineering church leadership as resulting from 1) misshaped desires 2) imitating humans and the world rather than Christ and 3) the subversive work of the Powers (Satan and the principalities\/systems of evil and sin in the world).<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> \u00a0Woodward then offers a remedy that involves dying to self and imitating the life and love of Jesus.<\/p>\n<p>What stood out to me in reading this book were the commonalities to our study of leadership derailment during the Oxford advance. My observations are discussed below.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Factors in Derailment and Domination<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The focus of the DGLP Oxford Advance in fall of 2023 was on the topic of leadership derailment. Derailment is anything that takes a leader off a successful course and causes them to fail in their leadership duties in some way. A few examples are burnout, moral failure, and abuse of power (or domination to use Woodward\u2019s term). When I reviewed the presentations from the Advance, I found that many of the factors that the Advance speakers ascribed to derailment were similar to Woodward\u2019s hypothesis of domination.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Jo Nelson &amp; The Toxic Triangle of Padilla<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Jo Nelson, an occupational psychologist used The Toxic Triangle of Padilla (shown below) to illuminate three factors that can lead to derailment: 1) Destructive Leaders 2) Susceptible Followers and 3) Conducive Environments.<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> These correspond with Woodward\u2019s domination diagnosis as follows. <strong>Destructive leaders<\/strong> takes into account the sinful (shadow side) nature of the leader, which relates to desire and imitation. Likewise, <strong>susceptible followers<\/strong> also relates to desire and imitation, but in those whom the leader leads. And finally, <strong>conducive environments<\/strong> relates to the organizational structure and mission of the church that Woodward addresses toward the end of his book. Because domineering is one form of leadership derailment, sucessfully avoiding it must include addressing all three of the areas in the toxic triangle.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-34423\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-1024x582.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"582\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-1024x582.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-300x170.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-768x436.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-1536x873.png 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-2048x1164.png 2048w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.40.10\u202fPM-150x85.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Simon Walker and the Forces of Power<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In both his Advance presentation and his book <em>Leading with Nothing to Lose, <\/em>Simon Walker focuses on the various forces of power that influence leadership. These relate to Woodward\u2019s discussion of power, but take it to more nuanced and practical levels as Walker introduces front stage vs. back stage force, strong and weak force, and expanding and consolidating force.<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> At the Advance, Walker broke the forces down even further into territorial, dynamic, passive, and responsive (see chart below). <a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a> \u00a0Walker\u2019s dive into the forces of power can help us better understand how leaders can succumb to domineering styles of leadership by the way they stay stuck in certain forces (territorial and dynamic) and do not access all of them (attentive and responsive) as Walker suggests a good leader must practice.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-34422 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-264x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"264\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-264x300.png 264w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-902x1024.png 902w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-768x872.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-150x170.png 150w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM-300x341.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Screenshot-2023-12-02-at-1.58.02\u202fPM.png 928w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 264px) 100vw, 264px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2><strong>Will Foster and the Importance of Self Leadership<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The ability to be self-aware and learn from one\u2019s mistakes are key components of avoiding the pitfalls of both derailment and a domineering leadership style, which relate to Woodward\u2019s discussion of desire and imitation.\u00a0 Self leadership was the focus of a portion of Will Foster\u2019s presentation at the Oxford Advance. Foster emphasized the necessity of soliciting feedback and being self-aware of one\u2019s strengths and weaknesses as key factors of healthy leaders.<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a> I suspect that most domineering leaders did not have healthy models to imitate in this regard.<\/p>\n<p>While Woodward approached the problem of domineering leaders in the church from a theological perspective, the speakers from the DGLP Advance approached derailment (which includes domination) from a more psychological and practical perspective. It&#8217;s interesting (and helpful) that there was so much overlap between the different approaches. Thankfully, I do not currently struggle with a domination problem, nor do I work with a domineering leader. However, it is good to have this information (and various ways to address the issue) if and when that does occur.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> J. R. Woodward, David Fitch, and Amos Yong, <em>The Scandal of Leadership: Unmasking the Powers of Domination in the Church<\/em> (100 Movements Publishing, 2023).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Woodward, Fitch, and Yong.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Nelson, Jo, \u201cLeadership Derailment\u201d (DLGP Oxford Advance, Oxford, September 23, 2023).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Simon P. Walker, <em>Leading with Nothing to Lose<\/em> (Piquant Publishing, 2010).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Walker, Simon, \u201cPlenary Session\u201d (Oxford, September 2023).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> Foster, Will, \u201cSelf Leadership\u201d (Oxford, September 2023).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. JR Woodward set out to write a book that \u201cwould offer theological immunity to the disease of domineering leadership in the church.\u201d [1] In The Scandal of Leadership, Woodward dives into the heart of failures and scandals among male church leaders who become corrupted by the power they wield.\u00a0 In this academic and theological [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":154,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2846],"class_list":["post-34421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-woodward","cohort-dlgp01"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/154"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34421"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34589,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34421\/revisions\/34589"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}