{"id":33714,"date":"2023-10-27T14:41:29","date_gmt":"2023-10-27T21:41:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/?p=33714"},"modified":"2023-10-27T14:41:29","modified_gmt":"2023-10-27T21:41:29","slug":"postmodernism-hicks-and-ordination-rooms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/postmodernism-hicks-and-ordination-rooms\/","title":{"rendered":"Postmodernism, Hicks and Ordination Rooms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is the moment that I can\u2019t stop thinking about. It occurred during my ordination interviews in the dreaded Theology Room. I had written about the temptations of Jesus and offered an interpretation of Jesus struggling with self-reliance, power, and self-preservation. The critique came: \u201cBeing middle-class, would you read this story differently if you were a refugee seeking to come into this country?\u201d I hesitated to offer an answer because I got lost in the observation that I was middle-class and whether I could put myself in the shoes of a refugee. How could they assume my social location, nor what if feels like to be a middle-class person? How could I offer an interpretation of the scriptures from a life I never lived? While I didn\u2019t get to explore these questions with the committee, I was rescued with the observation that my hesitancy gave the answer they wanted &#8211; \u201cthere are different ways to read this story.\u201d<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Perspective of Explaining Postmodernism<\/strong><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This is the social, political and theological climate that is explored by Stephen R. Hicks in his book, Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Hicks offers the historical rise of postmodernism as the natural critique to modernist thought that began to emerge after the Enlightenment. Postmodernism speaks to the failings of modernism, yet its natural outcomes lead to nihilism.[1] The strength of Hick\u2019s work is distillation of postmodern thought to the current political and social rhetoric that permeates the news cycle, social media, academia, and, perhaps, ordination interviews.[2] Hicks shows that modernism\u2019s strength is the premises that can be reasoned and critique toward the desired end, yet postmodernism\u2019s chief end is deconstruction in favor of relativistic perspectives that have no basis in reality, which is the point.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This leads Hicks to his two main thesis. One is historical as he charts the course of postmodernism\u2019s rise as intellectual thought. The second thesis is his critique of postmodernist thought and his reasoning for why it prevails in academic circles. The first thesis offered by Hicks:<\/p>\n<p><em>Postmodernism is the first ruthlessly consistent statement of the consequences of rejecting reason, those consequences being necessary given the history of epistemology since Kant.<\/em>[3]<\/p>\n<p>Charting the historical trajectory of modernism, Hicks offers this summary to the current philosophic thoughts of postmodernism. As he states, \u201cMetaphysics and epistemology are at the heart of this account of postmodernism.\u201d[4] Hicks observes that the main project of postmodernism is to question both reality and knowledge.[5]<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The second thesis that Hicks offers gets to the motivation behind those who are picking up the postmodern project. He stats:<\/p>\n<p><em>Postmodernism is the academic far left\u2019s epistemological strategy for responding to the crisis caused by the failures of socialism in theory and practice<\/em>.[6]<\/p>\n<p>Here, Hicks is observing that postmodernism was tied to the socialist experiment in politics. Once socialism was shown to be a failed ideology, he argues that those who held to Leftist-politics were faced with an existential crisis that would result in giving up cherished ideology or undermine the opposing systems of thought.[7] He even goes on to say that postmodernism is \u201ca symptom of the far Left\u2019s crisis of faith.\u201d[8]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Can I Imagine Being a Refugee?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Admittedly, postmodernism is offering a worth-while critique of modern thought. Heidegger\u2019s observation that \u201creason always reaches contradiction whenever it attempts to explore deep metaphysical issues.\u201d[9] As a person of faith, I would agree with that statement as I believe that questions of metaphysics and epistemology cannot be answered by reason alone. In many ways, I more sympathetic to the existentialist Kierkegaard trusting in a \u201cleap of faith.\u201d<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I do wonder about the limits of language. Our words, after all, are metaphorical and given meaning due to a sort of collectivist agreement to what anger feels like in my emotions and what it must mean to be feel middle-class, yet as postmodernist point out, it is impossible to have meaningful conversations without reason and objectivity. Vincent Lloyd is right when he observes, \u201cOur struggles are not only external, against laws and institutions, but internal, against our own malformed habits, feelings, and values. In this sense, we all participate in dignity because we all struggle against domination.\u201d[10]<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t think I can imagine what it is to be a refugee because I have not been one. I also cannot offer an interpretation of a Biblical text from that social location, yet I can be in community with people that are different. As I hear their stories, I can share in their realities as we connect by shared meaning. While I can\u2019t know the mind or reality of a refugee fleeing to this country or a first century Jew grappling with a divine mission, can know what it is to be human and through that grow the reality I inhabit with them.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u200c1. Stephen Hicks, <em>Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault<\/em> (Redland Bay, Qld: Connor Court Publishing Pty Ltd, 2019).p.201.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2. Summary of Postmodern Cultural Themes. Ibid, 19.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3. Ibid., 81.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>4. Ibid.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5. Ibid., 82.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. Ibid., 89.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>7. Ibid., 90.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>8. Ibid., 181.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>9. Ibid., 60.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>10. Vincent W Lloyd, <em>Black Dignity. <\/em>Yale University Press, 2023, 17-18.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is the moment that I can\u2019t stop thinking about. It occurred during my ordination interviews in the dreaded Theology Room. I had written about the temptations of Jesus and offered an interpretation of Jesus struggling with self-reliance, power, and self-preservation. The critique came: \u201cBeing middle-class, would you read this story differently if you were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2889],"class_list":["post-33714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-hicks-dlgp01","cohort-dlgp01"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33714"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33715,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33714\/revisions\/33715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}