{"id":32349,"date":"2023-04-16T19:37:49","date_gmt":"2023-04-17T02:37:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/?p=32349"},"modified":"2023-04-16T19:37:49","modified_gmt":"2023-04-17T02:37:49","slug":"personality-and-happiness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/personality-and-happiness\/","title":{"rendered":"Personality and Happiness"},"content":{"rendered":"

What can truly make us happy or what is the connection between personality and happiness? These were some of the thoughts as I read, Personality: What Make You the Way You Are<\/i> by Daniel Nettle. Interestedly, Nettle had the same idea, as he also wrote a book on happiness[1], concluding that happiness is the evolutionary condition that keeps us motivated to achieve the next goal[2]. The central question that came to mind as I read Nettle\u2019s book on personality is, how would each personality type define happiness?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Five Factor Model\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

There is certainly no shortage of interest in personality typing and those who want to better understand themselves and others. It is a rightly placed interest as personality can be evidenced in the behaviors and decision making in broad and narrow instances. The interesting and unique contribution that Nettle offers is an understanding of the usefulness and unifying approach of the five-factor model of personality. Nettle defines the five factors as: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Openness[3]. While each person has some measure of all five traits, some are more pronounced than others[4], much like the way that fractals exhibit the same pattern in large or small ways[5].\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

More Desirable Trait<\/b><\/p>\n

Which leads me to wonder if certain personality traits are more desirable? Often this seems to be the case, particularly with traits towards high extraversion and sociability[6]. This is important to consider when it comes to questions about happiness. One might assume that they would be more happy if they possessed a greater degree of extraversion, after all, \u201cExtroverts are supposed to be ambitious, go-getting and in the broadest sense, lusty\u2026\u201d[7]. Nettle points out that the reason that people desire certain traits is due to the incentives tied to them. He observes that there are two incentives, unconditional (naturally rewarding) and conditioned (developed rewards)[8]. This is what drives the desire for certain traits that rewarded, particularity in conditioned ways[9].\u00a0 <\/span>Nettle even observes that one such conditional reward is social status which \u201canchors both the Protestant work ethic and the excess of consumerism\u201d[10]. Further, no personality trait should be favored as each has usefulness in different context and situations[11].\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Agreeableness and Happiness<\/b><\/p>\n

While no personality trait should be favored, I am particularly drawn to the nature of Agreeableness as it is understood by the \u2018theory of the mind\u201d mechanism of human interaction. The theory of mind is expressed by ones ability to represent the mental and emotional state of another person, commonly expressed in the notion of empathy[12]. The higher a person\u2019s emphatic response, the higher one is rated in Agreeableness as a personality trait. Given that a high degree of Agreeableness would mean stranger social connection, then a person should be happy due to the level of social connection resulting from a high degree of understanding. However, Nettle considers this question in terms of Agreeableness being \u201cgood\u201d and concluded that, in fact, those with a high score of Agreeableness actually resulted in less success in the work environment[13]. Which, considering the propensity toward conditioned rewards, would mean that a person high in Agreeableness as less happy. Fascinatingly, Nettle recognizes the tension between those people want to be around (high Agreeableness) and those who are more successful (low Agreeableness) and how women are more like caught in this tension, and concludes \u201cit is a real issue\u201d[14].\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/b><\/p>\n

How would each personality type define happiness? Each would define it based on the degree in which their personality is expressed in their traits. Although one thing seems to be clear, regardless of how a personality trait is expressed, one cannot express happiness through conditioned responses outside of the person. Happiness is best expressed in understanding the unique strengths of each personality traits and managing the underlying deficiencies of each, yet even that does not seem to truly capture the nature of happiness and the complexity of personality traits.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u200c1. Nettle, Daniel. Happiness: The Science behind Your Smile<\/i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.<\/p>\n

2. https:\/\/greatergood.berkeley.edu\/article\/item\/book_review_happiness<\/p>\n

3. Nettle, Daniel. Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are<\/i>. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, 29.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

4. Ibid., 20.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

5. Ibid., 7.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

6. Ibid., 82.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

7. Ibid., 81.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

8. Ibid., 86.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

9. Ibid.<\/p>\n

10. Ibid.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

11. Ibid., 102-103.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

12. Ibid., 158-162.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

13. Ibid., 178.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

14. Ibid 179.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What can truly make us happy or what is the connection between personality and happiness? These were some of the thoughts as I read, Personality: What Make You the Way You Are by Daniel Nettle. Interestedly, Nettle had the same idea, as he also wrote a book on happiness[1], concluding that happiness is the evolutionary […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2723],"class_list":["post-32349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-nettle-dlgp01","cohort-dlgp01"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32349"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32349\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32350,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32349\/revisions\/32350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}