{"id":25393,"date":"2020-01-14T13:34:22","date_gmt":"2020-01-14T21:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=25393"},"modified":"2020-01-14T13:35:28","modified_gmt":"2020-01-14T21:35:28","slug":"traditioned-innovation-two-funerals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/traditioned-innovation-two-funerals\/","title":{"rendered":"Traditioned Innovation &#8211; Two Funerals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Building from a rich history and tradition, Evangelicals have the opportunity to innovate towards the next\u00a0 adjacent possible. Duke Divinity School proposes that traditioned innovation is \u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a way of thinking and being that holds the past and future in tension, not in opposition, [and] is crucial to the growth and vitality of Christian institutions\u201d (Faith and Leadership). The most meaningful innovative advancements are not disjoint from the past, but challenge the status quo <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">from<\/span><\/i> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">within the current time and culture.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> A deep understanding of the history of Evangelicalism is necessary for the most meaningful adjustments, changes, and innovation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In that vein, D. W. Bebbington\u2019s book, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Evangelicalism in Modern Britain, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">thoroughly lays the foundation of the last three hundred years of Evangelical history in Britain (and the West). It informs and surveys in a way that creates a deep well from which to draw keen insights and fresh ideas. Bebbington will go so far as to even use the word \u201cinnovation\u201d or a derivative when speaking about fields of prophecy and the understanding of scripture (88), the effects of Romanticism (104), engagement with the arts and social concern (182-183), church rituals (204), and theologians being influenced by popular thought (272). Evangelicalism, specifically, and Protestantism, generally, is by its very nature innovative and constantly changing. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ecclesia sempre reformada<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> &#8211; the church is always reforming. One would do well to intimately know the complex history of Evangelicalism to capitalize on that tradition, nuance, and history when considering alternative future realities &#8211; the goal of any global leader.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>The Enlightenment and Imaginative Innovation &#8211; A Funeral<\/b><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-25394 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/gravestone.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"183\" height=\"275\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/gravestone.jpeg 183w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/gravestone-150x225.jpeg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 183px) 100vw, 183px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Bebbington situates Evangelicalism as a traditioned innovation around interaction with Enlightenment thinking: \u201cTo recognise the early phase of Evangelicalism as an adaptation of the Protestant tradition<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0through contact with the Enlightenment helps explain its timing\u201d (53). The Enlightenment and following counter-reaction,Romanticism, divorced intuition and imagination, and Christian thought has been trying to effectively marry them ever since. I lament as I read a eulogy of a well-known pastor, where his friend <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">praised<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> him by saying, \u201cHe waved no plumes, wreathed no garlands, but struck from the shoulder and at the vitals. He was destitute of poetry and barren of imagination\u201d (quoted in Hughes, 36). Imagine yourself sitting in a pew at a friend\u2019s funeral. The eulogy begins and you know this person is trying to think of the highest compliments and most moving way to honor and remember a someone, and the eulogizer chooses to say \u201cHe was destitute of poetry and barren of imagination\u201d.\u00a0 It was a good thing, according to the speaker, to be fully reliant on intuition and reason. What a statement to grieve!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As I consider the extremes of overemphasizing reason and imagination, my current working formula for innovation is:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Innovation = Imagination x Integrative Thinking x Implementation<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I seek to marry the imaginative approach of what God might do as he is \u201cmaking all things new\u201d (Revelation 21:5, cf. Isaiah 43:19), with the intuitive, and even scientific reasoning, found in systems or integrative thinking. All the while, their is a bias towards action and implementation. Being steeped in the biblical narrative of God\u2019s redemption should form a Christian imagination of justice, righteousness and peace. The incarnation and the new heavens and the new earth provide a vision and depth of resource that far exceeds the \u201cgods\u201d of Silicon Valley. It\u2019s not enough, however, to have this imagination for what could be, one also needs the tools of integrative thinking at their disposal, including inductive reasoning, hypotheses and an ability to handle many variables. Last, innovation is a more than a think tank with need an implementation of new ideas.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>The Limits or Warnings of Innovation within Evangelicalism<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Bebbington\u2019s book gifts me with pause to consider the limits or warnings of attempting to innovative in an Evangelical context. In invite your input as I heed these warnings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Post-Enlightenment era overemphasizes inductive and scientific reasoning. Many Design Thinking methodologies assume a hypothesis\/test approach to complex problem solving. Might there be room for the Spirit to lead apart from the result of a prototype?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Evangelicalism has an infatuation with pragmatism (54-66). The utilitarian approach to innovation might lead to both means and ends that are out of step with God\u2019s intent.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As a result, one must be careful to not innovate God out of the picture. As an example, those attempting to copy the methods of revivals in hopes of current renewal have shifted their functional faith from God\u2019s movement to proven methodology.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Beware Evangelicalism\u2019s propensity to adapt to the trends of the time. Bebbington\u2019s introduction lays out the dual nature of Evangelicalism impacting culture and culture impacting Evangelicalism (1-2).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>A Darker Tradition Calling for Innovation<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In terms of critique, Bebbington\u2019s complete negligence of colonialism, imperialism, and nationalism is a gross oversight at least, and a perpetrator of continued blindness at most. While Bebbington\u2019s quadrilateral of coversionism, activism, biblicism, and crucicentrism (3) is incredibly helpful, all but activism focuses on a theological understanding. The definition implies Evangelicals are distinct mostly by what they believe, a little bit about their actions, but ignores the cultural moment and context in which it was formed. Imperialism and Colonialism are the umbrella for the quadrilateral or the table on which it sets. This flavored missionary endeavors to local people, issues of class, and the large separation of evangelism and social concern among Fundamentalists. I believe the richest innovations won\u2019t come from the extremes on the poles of ignoring\/ignorance and disassociating with Evangelicalism all together. The challenge for the 21st century Evangelical leader will be to innovate within this tradition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>An Innovative Funeral<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back to the funeral, might the eulogy of\u00a0 being \u201cdestitute of poetry and barren of imagination\u201d stand redeemed. Another picture of a funeral might provide the vision for tradition innovation needed to capture both the positive of Bebbing\u2019s history and a redemptive example from the shadow side of Evangelical heritage. A much different experience would be had at a different funeral\u2026 a New Orleans jazz funeral.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/funeral.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-25395 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/funeral.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"365\" height=\"273\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/funeral.jpeg 259w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/funeral-150x112.jpeg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 365px) 100vw, 365px\" \/><\/a>Louisiana\u2019s colonial past emphasized military brass bands for white citizens. Combining with West African spiritual practices, and Mardi Gras Indians, New Orleanians of color gave rise to an entirely new experience of celebrating life and mourning death. These funerals have a beautiful way of honoring tradition &#8211; symbolized in the chord structure and timing of the music, \u00a0 while looking to the newness of life for those in heaven and remaining here &#8211; symbolized by the improvisation of the musicians.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This funeral procession, along with rag music, military brass bands and blues, were the traditions from which jazz music innovated. The New Orleans jazz funeral took a tradition marred with brokenness and injustice and innovated something beautiful embodying God\u2019s work of making all things new. Might that encourage us to what\u2019s possible in our own traditioned innovations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">__<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> W. Bebbington. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(London: Routledge, 1989).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cFaith and Leadership: Traditioned Innovation\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Duke Divinity. <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Accessed 1\/10\/2020.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/faithandleadership.com\/category\/principles-practice-topics\/traditioned-innovation\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/faithandleadership.com\/category\/principles-practice-topics\/traditioned-innovation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Richard T. Hughes. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reviving the Ancient Faith <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(Abilene Texas: Abilene Christian University Press, 1996).<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Building from a rich history and tradition, Evangelicals have the opportunity to innovate towards the next\u00a0 adjacent possible. Duke Divinity School proposes that traditioned innovation is \u201ca way of thinking and being that holds the past and future in tension, not in opposition, [and] is crucial to the growth and vitality of Christian institutions\u201d (Faith [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":131,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12,1579],"class_list":["post-25393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bebbington","tag-innovation","cohort-lgp10"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/131"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25396,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25393\/revisions\/25396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}