{"id":2355,"date":"2014-09-11T13:17:50","date_gmt":"2014-09-11T13:17:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=2355"},"modified":"2014-09-11T13:17:50","modified_gmt":"2014-09-11T13:17:50","slug":"the-great-optometrist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/the-great-optometrist\/","title":{"rendered":"The Great Optometrist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I ordered new glasses. It\u2019s not really news worthy, as the lens prescription hasn\u2019t changed and the new frames will likely have little difference from the old ones. By my calculations, this is the fifteenth time that I\u2019ve ordered a new pair of glasses. I\u2019ve averaged a new pair every two years for the last thirty years. I\u2019ve appreciated the fact that I can see near, far and with detail during the course of these years. There is rarely a time when I\u2019m not wearing my glasses. Yet, there is always a reminder, in those moments when I slip them off to clean them, or to rub my eyes or when I lay them at my bedside at the end of a day, that apart from the lenses of my glasses, I really lack the capacity to see, I lack vision, I lack clarity.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/eye-exam-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2358 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/eye-exam-1-300x214.jpg\" alt=\"eye-exam-1\" width=\"300\" height=\"214\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/eye-exam-1-300x214.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/eye-exam-1-150x107.jpg 150w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/eye-exam-1.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>David Morgan, in his book <em>The Sacred Gaze: Religious Visual Culture in Theory and Practice,<\/em> attempts to help us gain clarity, as he traces through the significance of visual representations across many faith practices. While the ideal of trying to equate relevance to Hindu representation, Buddhists idols and Christian art and artifacts, (among others) is noble, there seemed to be something missing from his presentation.<\/p>\n<p>(Now, I must confess that I likely have a bias, having grown up in a Hindu home and having participated in several religious observances, including Islam and Sikhism)<\/p>\n<p>Morgan\u2019s own definition of religion is helpful in understanding his premise:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201cBy religion, I understand configurations of social relatedness and cultural ordering that appeal to powers that assist humans in organizing their collective and individual lives. These \u201cpowers\u201d may be supernatural or entirely circumscribed within the domain of natural phenomena. In either case, religion is a way of controlling events or experience for the purpose of living better, longer, more meaningfully, or with less hazard.\u201d (p. 52)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Establishing his view of religion is important to appreciating the consistency of how Morgan goes on to address the role of artistic representations across the lines of many faiths. He makes a clarifying statement regarding this position: \u201cImages make the god or saint or spirit available for petition, praise, offering, and negotiation.\u201d (p.59) Though consistent throughout the book, this premise appears to miss the mark as it relates to understanding faith from the perspective God gives to us, in the Bible.<\/p>\n<p>A religious perspective can rightly determine that art attempts to define, direct and even determine what the worshiper should think or feel. The representations, as Morgan notes in the quote above, are like messages from the one being worshipped to the worshipper. It would be like optometrist just handing you a pair of glasses without determining what prescription you need. Your capacity to see would likely change, but it wouldn\u2019t necessarily be for the better. In fact you may feel disoriented as a result.<\/p>\n<p>In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus points his listeners (Matthew 6:25-34) to \u201clook\u201d and \u201csee\u201d through nature so that they may consider the sovereign, timely and provisional care of Our Heavenly Father. Jesus, the Great Optometrist, invites us to consider who God is, via the eyes of our spiritual minds, through the natural art that abundantly surrounds. The birds, the flowers they point out toward God. It is as though; through our living faith (not static religion) Jesus fits us with the lens we need to see him clearly. The solution isn\u2019t merely having glasses. The solution is in learning how to see through a new pair of lenses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-2356\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies-224x300.jpg\" alt=\"birdslillies\" width=\"224\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies-224x300.jpg 224w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies-766x1024.jpg 766w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies-150x200.jpg 150w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies-300x400.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/birdslillies.jpg 1198w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 224px) 100vw, 224px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Religion is like owning a pair of frames or simply some fashion frames. Morgan refers to this using the term \u201ctextuality\u201d:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u00a0\u201cIn print culture, images may act like texts or referents, that is, as signifiers of something else\u2026Images appear most often anchored to texts, which use pictures or diagrams as forms of reference to themselves. A caption frames how one should \u201cread\u201d an image, foreclosing certain possibilities and narrowing interpretation as much as possible.\u201d (p. 90)<\/p>\n<p>Our faith in Jesus Christ, should not be like just owning frames. It should be more like looking through a perfectly prescribed pair of lenses. I remember the day I received my first pair of glasses. At first I was reluctant to put them on, but when finally I did, it was a spectacular and overwhelming feeling! My mind suddenly was pressed into processing more detail than it had previously been taking in through my eyes! Suddenly the teachers were writing with darker chalk; the trees had leaves, the city buses had numbers and the streets had names. So much had changed, not because I owned frames, but because I started looking at the world through a perfectly prescribed new pair of lenses.<\/p>\n<p>I remember the day when I made my decision to follow Jesus Christ as my Saviour. After months of reluctance, when I finally immersed myself, in faith in Christ, it was a spectacular and overwhelming feeling! The world, its symbols, icons and representations no longer had static meaning. Instead there was (and still is) so much to discover, across all facets of life, that point out toward the greatness of God. My new faith lenses, perfectly prescribed by the Great Optometrist, has changed the way I view the world. Just like my regular visits to the optometrist down the street, regular evaluations help to ensure that I am suited with the right lenses to have the best opportunities to discover more about Our God.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I ordered new glasses. It\u2019s not really news worthy, as the lens prescription hasn\u2019t changed and the new frames will likely have little difference from the old ones. By my calculations, this is the fifteenth time that I\u2019ve ordered a new pair of glasses. I\u2019ve averaged a new pair every two years for the last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[284],"class_list":["post-2355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-morgan","cohort-lgp4"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2355"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2359,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2355\/revisions\/2359"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}