{"id":23273,"date":"2019-06-06T22:43:15","date_gmt":"2019-06-07T05:43:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=23273"},"modified":"2019-06-06T22:43:15","modified_gmt":"2019-06-07T05:43:15","slug":"grounded-ecclesiology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/grounded-ecclesiology\/","title":{"rendered":"Grounded ecclesiology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-23275 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"783\" height=\"522\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised.jpg 1072w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/hands-raised-150x100.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 783px) 100vw, 783px\" \/><\/a>Learning from ethnography, where an anthropological lens assists in clarifying spiritual questions, seems to be a key approach of Martyn Percy, Anglican theologian and ecclesiologist, and Dean of Christ Church, Oxford. \u201cShow us what you do, and I will tell you what you believe,\u201d he seems to be saying. In a collection of essays and responses on Percy\u2019s theological writings, Ian Markham and Joshua Daniel compose a rich and diverse assortment of provocative essays which grapple with postmodernism, feminism, sexuality, the role of church in society, and revivalism. They seem to position Percy as a \u201creasonable radical\u201d gifted at interpreting culture to the church, and church to culture, aligned with a progressive yet thoughtful and faithful approach to change in the church in Western society.<\/p>\n<p>In the study of the church, Percy says, \u201cThe data is overwhelming: human interaction, aesthetics, performance, ritual, symbol, culture, ascription \u2013 to say nothing of power, authority, and charisma. And we have not even mentioned doctrine in this list. To study the church is to encounter the \u201cethnographic dazzle\u201d: sights, sounds, taste, touch \u2013 a veritable sensory overload of the social-sacred.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rather than starting with doctrinal statements which define faith in objective, antiseptic terms, Percy asserts we can deduce belief from the situated actions of the body of believers. He layers an understanding of culture over phenomenological data within a congregation. I\u2019d like to focus in particular on Percy\u2019s research on a church I am well-acquainted with, the Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship. (We lived ten minutes away.) This church is the location for what was termed the \u201cToronto Blessing\u201d; it continues to this day under the name \u201cCatch the Fire\u201d, though with much less intensity than in the initial years of the outpouring beginning in 1994. Originally a Vineyard congregation, it was ejected from the denomination in 1996. Percy states, \u201c[T]he \u201cToronto Blessing\u201d needs to be understood in its own (postmodern) cultural context of revivalism \u2026 The discreet branding of manifestations created a consumer-led market hungry for larger and more powerful spiritual epiphenomena, which might just achieve what the previous manifestation only hinted at.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Understanding the cultural and geographic milieu is a necessary part of interpreting meaning of the symbols, discourse, and actions at play at this church. Consider these qualities that enabled the Toronto Blessing to thrive for a time:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Location next to a major international airport with hotel infrastructure in nearby proximity facilitated long, intense visits to the church\u2019s daily services<\/li>\n<li>Launch of the movement in the early 90s as the internet and email began to be commonly used facilitated wide dissemination of news of the revival<\/li>\n<li>A postmodern environment that was increasingly open to supernatural manifestations (eg. holy laughter, being slain in the Spirit, golden fillings or dust, etc) and uprooted from historic theological doctrines and practices<\/li>\n<li>General decline of the typical evangelical congregation in Canada leading to a hunger for something new<\/li>\n<li>Availability of merchandise (CDs, videos, books, curriculum, etc.) to train others and replicate the movement elsewhere<\/li>\n<li>Anonymity of attendees, allowing for the controversial renewal to touch individuals and leaders from many denominations: Baptist, Presbyterian, Alliance, Anglican, and more<\/li>\n<li>Physical expression was encouraged (dancing, waving flags, raising arms, doing \u2018carpet time\u2019, laying on of hands, crying, laughing, etc)<\/li>\n<li>Cultural attitudes within capitalist society which encourages \u201cchurch shopping\u201d \u2013 going to where one will receive a blessing<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>But what is the fruit of such phenomena? After returning to TACF a second time, years later after the novelty of the initial outpouring had abated, Percy states, \u201cPerhaps all that can now be said is that the experiences of those attending the Toronto Blessing meetings since 1994 seem to have been primarily cathartic; one could almost describe the effect of the \u201cblessing\u201d upon worshippers as having been something like a cleansing spiritual enema.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> Other than that, very little long-term transformation seems to have occurred. Instead, one greeter admits to Percy that \u201cWe\u2019re all tired.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> Revival fatigue plagues those who used to attend, and one wonders in retrospect what it was all about.<\/p>\n<p>In the <em>Journal of Contemporary Religion<\/em>, Percy writes that to better understand a church\u2019s life \u201c[T]he focus shifts from \u2018blueprints\u2019 about the way the church or congregation could or should be to that of \u2018grounded ecclesiology\u2019 \u2026 It is through a matrix of conversation, interviews, observation, and the savouring of representative vignettes that one can begin to piece together a more coherent picture of what it is like to belong to a group, to be a pilgrim, and to believe.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\"><sup>[5]<\/sup><\/a> The official dogmas of a church mean little when grassroots practices reveal the true priorities of the people.<\/p>\n<p>________________________________<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Ian Markham and Joshua Daniel, eds. <em>Reasonable Radical? Reading the Writings of Martyn Percy <\/em>(Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2018). Kindle, loc. 3752.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Ibid.,\u00a0Kindle, loc. 318.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Ibid.,\u00a0Kindle, loc. 7437.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Ibid., Kindle, loc. 1200.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Martyn Percy, \u201cAdventure and Atrophy in a Charismatic Movement: Returning to the \u2018Toronto Blessing,\u2019\u201d <em>Journal of Contemporary Religion<\/em> 20, no. 1 (January 1, 2005): 71\u201390, Accessed June 6, 2019, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/135379000313918\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/135379000313918<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learning from ethnography, where an anthropological lens assists in clarifying spiritual questions, seems to be a key approach of Martyn Percy, Anglican theologian and ecclesiologist, and Dean of Christ Church, Oxford. \u201cShow us what you do, and I will tell you what you believe,\u201d he seems to be saying. In a collection of essays and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[964],"class_list":["post-23273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-percy","cohort-lgp8"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23273"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23277,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23273\/revisions\/23277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}