{"id":20384,"date":"2018-11-15T18:14:30","date_gmt":"2018-11-16T02:14:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=20384"},"modified":"2018-11-15T18:27:47","modified_gmt":"2018-11-16T02:27:47","slug":"keep-on-moving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/keep-on-moving\/","title":{"rendered":"Keep On Moving"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No, Really. The title is for you. Don\u2019t stop here, keep on moving to a blog with something to say. The whole thing was just a struggle this week. Thoughts are disjointed and unclear. For some reason, though I usually really enjoy writing, it is just not working this week. I encourage you to skip over this blog and check out the rest of the cohort this time.<\/p>\n<p>I have read significant portions of \u2018The Leadership Mystique\u2019 by Manfred Kets De Vries and found the book interesting, challenging and thought provoking. But, in reading around the text I found more that captured and resonated with me on a personal level. I feel sufficiently comfortable with all of you to unpack some of the thoughts that prevailed while reading this book. In addition, I stumbled across an interview with the author regarding his assumptions about leadership and the psychological frailties that are part of their character. In this interview he stipulates that <em>\u201cirrationality is integral to human nature\u201d<\/em>and therefore it is prone to be realized in leaders as well as followers.<a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> It was this interview, in Harvard Business Review, that resonated with me. I apologize in advance if it\u2019s too much information for you all and like Jean did last week warn you that you may not want to continue.<\/p>\n<p>As I hinted at in our chat the other day I come from a pretty dysfunctional family. My father was (and still is) incredibly narcissistic and exhibited many of the irrational characteristics described by De Vries both in the book and the interview that I came across. (Characteristics, I might add that De Vries suggests are necessary in leaders. He states; <em>\u201cLeaders need a healthy dose of narcissism in order to survive. It\u2019s the engine that drives leadership. Assertiveness, self-confidence, tenacity, and creativity just can\u2019t exist without it.\u201d<\/em>)<a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> Yet, he was an incredible leader, a Christian pastor who developed a strong following, and demonstrated qualities such as charisma, intelligence, strong communication, vision, decisiveness, etc.<\/p>\n<p>In the Harvard Business Review with De Vries he says the following all of which resonates with my experience of my father: <em>\u201cI found [leaders] often had experienced deprivation of some kind early in life.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><strong>Check\u00a0<\/strong><em>\u201cThey work to be independent. It is their way of having more control over a world they often perceive (given their early experiences) as uncontrollable.\u201d <\/em><strong>Check\u00a0<\/strong><em>\u201cThe trouble is that once they\u2019ve proved they\u2019re successful, they can\u2019t get off the treadmill. All they know how to do is work.\u201d <\/em><strong>Check\u00a0<\/strong><em>\u201cIn the meantime, their personal relationships have become a mess.\u201d <\/em><strong>Check\u00a0<\/strong><em>\u201cSo they feel stuck and bored. Unfortunately, in business [or in church leadership] you are not allowed to show pain. So, to liven himself up a bit, the [leader] might find a new wife or he might try to pull off some really big, aggressive deal. Now that provides some excitement. Mergers and marriages both help to mask a [leader\u2019s] psychic pain.\u201d<\/em><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a>\u00a0<strong>Check<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So, is there application of this work to the church context. Without a doubt. While most of my blogs deal directly with issues of emerging generations it is pertinent here to consider the pastoral leadership of churches. What roles do we encourage them to play to be \u2018successful\u2019 that may be contributing to irrationality and dysfunction? In the drive to serve a church full of broken individuals whose particular crises are \u2018urgent\u2019 it is frequently difficult for pastors to take time for their own internal development. <em>\u201cMany executives [read pastors] don\u2019t pay much attention to their inner world\u2026It\u2019s rarely a conscious avoidance, but it\u2019s an avoidance nonetheless.\u201d<\/em><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> In addition, there is often an unconscious assumption that displays of vulnerability or weakness will raise doubts in the minds of the congregation about the suitability of the pastor\u2019s leadership.<\/p>\n<p>As attempts are made to make the church more attractive, retain membership, and utilize business models for organizational purposes pastors frequently find themselves in the role of a CEO, often a position at odds with their initial calling. I saw this in my own pastor father and reflect much of it myself. \u00a0If De Vries has anything to offer the church than I believe it is in his recognition that the clinical paradigm has much to contribute to organizational structure and understanding of leadership within that structure. This is as important for the church as it might be for the corporate world. If we are to be a healthy organization and encourage the health of our leaders\/pastors, application of the insights provided by De Vries would seem beneficial.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the quote that will remain with me.\u00a0<em>&#8220;When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.&#8221;<\/em><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a> That is what I am doing with this blog.<\/p>\n<p>Mike drop \u2013 Sorry if you endured. This sucked!!<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20387 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Unknown-3.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"204\" height=\"136\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Unknown-3.jpeg 275w, https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Unknown-3-150x100.jpeg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 204px) 100vw, 204px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a>Coutu, Diane. &#8220;Putting Leaders on the Couch.&#8221; Harvard Business Review. August 01, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2018. https:\/\/hbr.org\/2004\/01\/putting-leaders-on-the-couch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a>Coutu, Diane. &#8220;Putting Leaders on the Couch.&#8221; Harvard Business Review. August 01, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2018. https:\/\/hbr.org\/2004\/01\/putting-leaders-on-the-couch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a>Coutu, Diane. &#8220;Putting Leaders on the Couch.&#8221; Harvard Business Review. August 01, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2018. https:\/\/hbr.org\/2004\/01\/putting-leaders-on-the-couch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a>Kets De Vries, Manfred.\u00a0<em>The Leadership Mystique: Leading Behavior in the Human Enterprise<\/em>. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall\/Financial Times, 2006. P. 46<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/A28CE73C-411E-4256-87C3-252F91207A20#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a>Ibid p. 1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No, Really. The title is for you. Don\u2019t stop here, keep on moving to a blog with something to say. The whole thing was just a struggle this week. Thoughts are disjointed and unclear. For some reason, though I usually really enjoy writing, it is just not working this week. I encourage you to skip [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":98,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[536,1402],"class_list":["post-20384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-kets-de-vries","tag-weak-blogging","cohort-lgp8"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/98"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20384"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20388,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20384\/revisions\/20388"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}