{"id":19705,"date":"2018-10-24T23:33:10","date_gmt":"2018-10-25T06:33:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=19705"},"modified":"2018-10-25T09:04:59","modified_gmt":"2018-10-25T16:04:59","slug":"i-wonder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/i-wonder\/","title":{"rendered":"I Wonder"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cI wonder\u2026\u201d Those words shared by Dr. Jason Clark was meant to convey a particular posture in how we study and learn. I forget exactly the context in which it was shared, but it was one of his talks meant to encourage our cohort to hold our ideas, thoughts and learnings loosely. The memory still holds me captivated to that moment when I heard it afresh in the context of higher learning. These words evoke a kind of child-like playfulness, a naivet\u00e9, an invitation to imagine something else. For me, it gently invites me to a space in my mind where I just slow down in my thinking; to pause and reflect on my thoughts.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There was a time in my life when I tried to place ideas in sort of a binary form. Every idea in my mind went through a filter: either true or false; valid or invalid, warranted or unwarranted, etc.. My project was simply not to have gray areas in my thinking. There was simply no time and space for this. I had assumed that for anyone to be considered a good and clear thinker, he or she would have considered and settled the big ideas in philosophy and theology, i.e., nature of time, determinism vs. freewill, calvinism vs. arminianism, etc.. After all, theology was the \u201cqueen of the sciences\u201d and once ruled the many domains of human knowledge. If there was anything important to be known, it was in these disciplines. My academic training, I\u2019m afraid encouraged this attitude, but in the end served as a corrective.<\/p>\n

Thank goodness I have sobered up. I no longer think this way. Besides, it was tiring and in the end intellectually dishonest. There were just too many occasions when I exclaimed \u201cWow! I once held this belief X so passionately and now know it to be false\u201d that I had to stop and reevaluate how I had to come to know anything. My ego can only withstand enough of these before realizing I am in not omniscient. Pride has a way of hiding the obvious. I did not know it at the time, but I was getting introduced to intellectual humility, the virtue Richard Paul and Linda Elder write about in their chapter on Essential Intellectual Traits.1<\/sup> It became clear. I realized that if I could be wrong on something I had previously not doubted, no beliefs of mine were impervious to further scrutiny.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Did I succumb to wrong impressions about humility; the twisted notion that to be humble requires being a doormat? By God\u2019s grace, no. Like I said earlier, I felt freer. Philip Dow in his book Virtuous Minds: Intellectual Character Development writes \u201cintellectually humble people value truth over their egos\u2019 need to be right, they are freed up to admit the limits of their own knowledge.\u201d2<\/sup> As an amateur Christian apologist it is easy to feel inadequate when I cannot give adequate answers to seekers\u2019 questions. While it is no excuse to neglect doing the hard work of study, it is liberating to admit I do not know certain things, but I can always find out.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

A prideful person does not listen to advice because of the predetermination that he or she is right. Scripture supports intellectual humility in ways we might have overlooked. Consider Proverbs 12:15 \u201cThe way of fools seems right to them, but the wise listen to advice.\u201d Abraham Lincoln is arguably one of the best presidents in American history; famous for saving the Union, but not many know about his humility. One historian tells of a story about an occasion when Lincoln gave a direct order to Edwin Stanton that was disobeyed. Despite their differences, which was not a secret, one would have expected some deference on Stanton\u2019s part since this was after the Civil War. Lincoln could have easily dismissed him for insubordination but instead decided to meet with him to listen to what others in Lincoln\u2019s cabinet considered an insult. He said, \u201cthat is no insult, it an expression of opinion; and what troubles me most about it is that Stanton said it and Stanton is usually right.\u201d3<\/sup><\/p>\n

When I think about Lincoln\u2019s example of humility I am brought to new heights because with the Holy Spirit\u2019s help we can be like him. And yet at the same time I am brought to new lows\u00a0 <\/span>because there are not enough men and women today who come close to this. The reflective ministry practitioner in me asks the following: Do I exhibit the kind of intellectual humility in my research that I do not hesitate to ask for advice from my faculty advisor? Am I willing to go where truth leads and expose prejudices for what they are? Am I willing to listen to differing opinions with a predisposition to change my mind? I wonder.<\/p>\n

\n

1<\/sup> Richard Paul and Linda Elder, The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools (Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2009), Loc. 165, Kindle.<\/p>\n

2<\/sup> Phil Dow, Virtuous Minds: Intellectual Character Development (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2013), 72.<\/p>\n

3<\/sup> “Lincolns Assassination Mystery or Stantons Secret …,” , accessed October 25, 2018, http:\/\/www.civilwarbummer.com\/lincolns-assassination-mystery-or-stantons-secret-agents\/.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cI wonder\u2026\u201d Those words shared by Dr. Jason Clark was meant to convey a particular posture in how we study and learn. I forget exactly the context in which it was shared, but it was one of his talks meant to encourage our cohort to hold our ideas, thoughts and learnings loosely. The memory still […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":113,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[290],"class_list":["post-19705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-elder","cohort-lgp9"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/113"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19705"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19705\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19725,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19705\/revisions\/19725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}