{"id":15381,"date":"2017-11-16T14:32:19","date_gmt":"2017-11-16T22:32:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dminlgp\/?p=15381"},"modified":"2017-11-16T14:32:19","modified_gmt":"2017-11-16T22:32:19","slug":"i-thought-sandboxes-were-only-for-kids","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/i-thought-sandboxes-were-only-for-kids\/","title":{"rendered":"I Thought Sandboxes were only for Kids!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Honestly, what do I do? I want to be a realist optimist instead of a fearful skeptic, maybe a cautious tester, but probably not the transparent evangelist. [1] But we are living and leading in a time when more people than ever before are willing to share openly and publicly about themselves, their work and their lives\u2014even the very personal and intimate details of their lives. It is certainly a time of greater openness and the sharing of all facets of life, work, and faith. Because of this \u201cgreater openness is inevitable\u201d and expected in all parts of society; this includes businesses and organizations. [2]<\/p>\n<p>It is in this contest that Charlene Li assists the business and organizational leader in navigating this new era of social media, all the while affirming that social media has the power to transform business and organizations. It begins by being more open, by letting go of some control and allowing social media to be a platform where a broader base of relationships can be cultivated and maintained. [3] Because there are more people online than ever before, more businesses and organizations can speak to and build relationships with broader segments of the population than ever before. At this point, I want to get right to the question. What does this mean for world missions? It seems that in world missions, social media can be the best of friends or the worst of enemies, both for the organization and for the missionaries themselves. A sandbox may be part of the answer.<\/p>\n<p>As a missions leader, on more than one occasion I have received an email from a concerned supporter stating that they saw missionary X on Facebook doing Y when they should have been doing Z. I am sometimes asked to intervene to make sure the missionary is aware of the impact of their posts. To be sure, missionary X may not have been using wisdom in their posting efforts. But in defense of the missionary, it is difficult to feel the influence of social media when one lives so far away from the impact point. Not to mention that missionaries have lives too! However, like the threat of an arctic wind, overexposure on social media can be dangerous at best and deadly at worst.<\/p>\n<p>On the other side of the coin, on more than one occasion I have received a happy email from a supporter who said they saw missionary X was doing well in both ministry and family and they were happy for them. There is no point to these two examples other than to illustrate the expediency by which can people can disseminate, receive, and respond to information, and to illustrate the power of social media to inform opinion and elicit an almost immediate reaction. It can be a friend or an enemy. [4]<\/p>\n<p>Historically, the missionary community has been one of the more open communities. For generations, missionaries have written volumes about their personal lives and ministry via monthly newsletters. The <a href=\"https:\/\/ifphc.org\">Flower Pentecostal Heritage Center <\/a>has many examples. However, today, and rightly so, people want to know the missionaries they support and have a relationship with them. Because of the distance factor, much of this relationship is based on a social media presence.<\/p>\n<p>This is difficult for some missionaries because where they live and minister requires a certain amount of obscurity. For others, it is a practical safety issue. American\u2019s living overseas have become targets. To illustrate, for reasons that are obvious, my wife and I never post on social media about ministry that takes us away from our home until after the fact\u2014when we return home. So what do we do as leaders in missionary organizations? What do missionaries do to be open and yet safe?<\/p>\n<p>According to Li, \u201cOpen leadership requires that you create structure, process, and discipline around openness when there is none so that people know what to expect and how to behave in a new open environment.\u201d[5] This one sentence is Li\u2019s golden kernel of truth for leaders in the new era. Open leaders build trust, build confidence, and change organizations. [6] And here all along, what some consider the enemy of organizational structure (openness) is the very thing that can help build trust, build confidence and bring about positive change.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, it seems that Li speaks directly to the missionary community when she speaks of \u201cSandbox Covenants.\u201d The use of the sandbox metaphor with it\u2019s defined boundaries and rules is both encouraging and refreshing. Encouraging in that it is not necessary to give up total control or exposure to the winds of social media. Also, there is reassurance that a methodology exists that can help missionaries and missions organizations be more open in their communication. This openness can lead to greater and broader relationships for the missionaries themselves and for the missions sending organization. [7]<\/p>\n<p>Li\u2019s example of a \u201cSocial Media Guidelines Checklist\u201d is both helpful and practical and can be used as a guide in setting those sandbox boundaries and rules. Li lists transparency, responsibility, confidentiality and common sense and judgment as basic guidelines for engagement with social media. Of the four guidelines, common sense and judgment are the most practical and sometimes the most forgotten guidelines. [8]<\/p>\n<p>To conclude, transparency and openness can be a two-edged sword in the missionary community. On the one hand, it can be a tool for information and relationship building while on the other hand, it can cause issues of misunderstanding or even safety issues for the missionary family and the organization. That is why it is crucial for missionary leaders to create structures and boundaries that allow for openness and transparency in the missionary community and yet maintain safety for the community as a whole. Li\u2019s Sandbox Covenants address this issue conceptually and practically. In this way, <i>Open Leadership: How Social Technology Can Transform the Way You Lead <\/i>speaks directly to the missionary community, and it\u2019s leaders. And I thought sandboxes were only for kids!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Charlene Li. <i>Open Leadership: How Social Technology Can Transform the Way\u00a0<\/i><i>You Lead<\/i>. Kindle ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010, 174-79.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 5.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 163.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 12.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 107.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 186.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 110.<\/li>\n<li>Ibid., 112.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Honestly, what do I do? I want to be a realist optimist instead of a fearful skeptic, maybe a cautious tester, but probably not the transparent evangelist. [1] But we are living and leading in a time when more people than ever before are willing to share openly and publicly about themselves, their work and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":90,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[708,220],"class_list":["post-15381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-charlene-li","tag-li","cohort-lgp7"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/90"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15381"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15389,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15381\/revisions\/15389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.georgefox.edu\/dlgp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}